Medical Hostages
نویسندگان
چکیده
A disturbing but common practice in many developing countries is the detainment of women who have recently given birth and who cannot afford their hospital charges. Contrary to policies aimed at encouraging women to deliver in health facilities, this practice is an abuse of their rights and has implications for wider maternal and neonatal health. Detention of women is a surprisingly common problem, with current and recent examples of this practice found in Burundi, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, the Philippines and Zimbabwe.1 It is, however, very difficult to estimate the extent of the problem as there are no prevalence studies and in many situations these detentions are illegal with no official figures. Most of the information concerning this practice therefore comes from assessments of single hospitals or anecdotal reports. A typical example involves a woman being admitted to hospital, often with a complication of pregnancy that requires an emergency intervention. She is treated with no upfront charges but is then required to pay before being allowed to leave. If she doesn’t have the money to pay on departure, she may be detained, often with her baby, for weeks or months while her family raises the necessary funds. A Caesarean section, for example, can cost a woman more than the average annual wage in her country. In effect, she is held hostage until the debt is paid. A report from Cameroon described a case where an infant spent nearly an entire year with her mother in hospital.2 For their part, hospitals stress that women are not denied treatment and point to the need for co-payments for services to be delivered. This practice is not limited to maternal health; it also happens with patients who have had surgical or other costly procedures. Generally law enforcement agencies are not involved in detaining patients, but hospitals employ private security guards, who check and stop patients on exit. Some are “just” detained, while others are forced to work to earn money. Women who need emergency obstetric care are therefore faced with a ghastly dilemma: do they risk giving birth at home without access to medical care, or do they face an uncertain period of detention in hospital until someone pays their bill? Detention is detrimental to maternal and child health with short and long-term implications for the infant. Pregnancy and childbirth are precarious times for both mother and baby and institutional deliveries are considered best practice in global health. The threat of being detained discourages women from going to hospital in the first place, reducing antenatal care and increasing the risk of maternal and infant death around childbirth. Globally, 290,000 women die from pregnancy-related causes each year.3 Usually the causes are preventable and, in a clinical setting, relatively simple to treat. In addition to this unacceptable
منابع مشابه
Incapacitating agents: weapons of mass disruption
Terrorism, and with it the possibility of hostage taking and sieges, has become a common feature of our times. The gas used to subdue terrorists in Moscow on 26 October 2002, which appeared to be responsible for the deaths of 123 of the 127 hostages killed in the crisis, remains unknown. Much criticism was levelled at the Russian security forces following the rescue of hostages for not revealin...
متن کاملSuper-Users: Hackers, Management Hostages, or Working Class Heroes? A study of user influence on redesign in distributed organizations
متن کامل
Exclusivity in Licensing Alliances: Using Hostages to Support Technology Commercialization
EXCLUSIVITY IN LICENSING ALLIANCES: USING HOSTAGES TO SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION DEEPAK SOMAYA,* YOUNGJUN KIM and NICHOLAS S. VONORTAS 1 College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A. 2 A.R. Sanchez, Jr. School of Business, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas, U.S.A. 3 Center for International Science and Technology Policy an...
متن کاملBeware the Siren’s Song: Why “Non-Lethal” Incapacitating Chemical Agents are Lethal
A number of events have brought “non-lethal” chemical incapacitating agents into the news recently. Most prominently, their use in the rescue of hostages held in the Moscow theater in October 2002 encouraged advocates of the military development of such weapons, since most of the hostages were rescued. Detractors were alarmed that over 15% of the hostages died of effects of the chemical agent (...
متن کاملSecurity men disguised as workers free hostages in Iranian hijacking
TEHRAN,Iran Iranian security men, disguised as m aintenance w orkers and a doctor, yesterday overpow ered four hijackers w ho had threatened to blow up a Kuwaiti jet at Tehran’s airport and freed the rem aining hostages of the six-day o r deal. The gunm en, w ho had com m an deered the Airbus A-300 jetliner carrying 161 people on Tuesday, w ere "severely beaten u p ” during the assault, accor...
متن کاملPlacing the Stockholm Syndrome in Perspective
n an August morning in 1973, an escaped convict took four bank employees their captors. Psychologists called this newly discovered phenomenon the Stockholm Syndrome.1 A coping mechanism also known as the Survival Identification Syndrome, the Common Sense Syndrome, or, simply, transference, the Stockholm Syndrome usually consists of three components that may occur separately or in combination wi...
متن کامل